Foundations 5 - Finding "The Way" in Scripture

This lesson will help reveal some truths that were secretly hidden in Scripture....a cleverly hidden map to the Way of the Nazarene Essenes
This is the fifth installment of a series of seven introductory lessons in Essene studies.
Call to God
Click below. Listen and recite the invocation in Hebrew along with the cantor. Let the words resonate within you. Open your heart and prepare to study with Wisdom.Prayer
Scripture Reading
19After Herod died, an angel of the Lord appeared in a dream to Joseph in Egypt 20and said, "Get up, take the child and his mother and go to the land of Israel, for those who were trying to take the child's life are dead."21So he got up, took the child and his mother and went to the land of Israel. 22But when he heard that Archelaus was reigning in Judea in place of his father Herod, he was afraid to go there. Having been warned in a dream, he withdrew to the district of Galilee, 23and he went and lived in a town called Nazareth. So was fulfilled what was said through the prophets: "He will be called a Nazarene."
Matthew 2:19-23
5"We have found this man to be a troublemaker, stirring up riots among the Jews all over the world. He is a ringleader of the Nazarene sect 6and even tried to desecrate the temple; so we seized him. 8By examining him yourself you will be able to learn the truth about all these charges we are bringing against him."
9The Jews joined in the accusation, asserting that these things were true.
10When the governor motioned for him to speak, Paul replied: "I know that for a number of years you have been a judge over this nation; so I gladly make my defense. 11You can easily verify that no more than twelve days ago I went up to Jerusalem to worship. 12My accusers did not find me arguing with anyone at the temple, or stirring up a crowd in the synagogues or anywhere else in the city. 13And they cannot prove to you the charges they are now making against me. 14However, I admit that I worship the God of our fathers as a follower of the Way, which they call a sect. I believe everything that agrees with the Law and that is written in the Prophets, 15and I have the same hope in God as these men, that there will be a resurrection of both the righteous and the wicked.
Acts 24:5-15
1Many have undertaken to draw up an account of the things that have been fulfilled among us, 2just as they were handed down to us by those who from the first were eyewitnesses and servants of the word. 3Therefore, since I myself have carefully investigated everything from the beginning, it seemed good also to me to write an orderly account for you, most excellent Theophilus, 4so that you may know the certainty of the things you have been taught.
Luke 1:1-4
Lesson
As we read the Scriptures above, we get two different accounts of what it means to be a Nazarene. According to Matthew, Yeshua was called a Nazarene strictly because he lived in the town of Nazareth. Luke seemed to have different information concerning Nazarenes. Luke wrote in the Book of Acts that the Nazarenes were those who followed the Way. According to Luke, the term, Nazarene denoted a member of the religious sect of Nazarenes. Luke writes that the members of this sect believed everything in accordance with the Law and the Prophets.
Luke mentioned two other Jewish sects. These sects were the Sadducees and the Pharisees. Philo of Alexandria, a first century Jewish philosopher, added a third sect in his writings which he called the Therapeutae. Josephus, the first century Jewish historian, discusses a third sect as well which he calls the Essenes. He states the Essenes were scattered far and wide and were in every city, being numerous in Judea in his time. When one reviews the characteristics of Philo's therapuetae and Josephus' Essenes, it becomes apparent that the Egyptian Therapeutae and Judean Essenes were different versions of followers of the same belief. Josephus also alluded to a "fourth sect" beside the Essenes but he did not name it. According to Luke, that fourth sect was the Nazarenes.
As we have explained in a previous lesson, Nazarenes were a group of northern Essenes from Mount Carmel. The term, Nazarene is derived from the Hebrew word, Nazir. It is from the verb, Nazar, which means "to separate". The Torah often mentions those who take a vow of separation, a Nazarite vow. The Nazarene sect seems to have evolved from these "separated ones".
The hidden message woven into the Book of Acts and the Book of Luke is that Yeshua was a Nazarene Rabbi. As a Nazarene Master, he guided His followers to a new understanding of the path to God. He called this path "the Way". In the Book of Acts, Luke describes the Nazarenes as a sect that was "persecuted", "spoken against", "maligned" and blamed for "no small disturbance". Here are some other references in his scripture that describe the Nazarenes and their Way:
"About that time there arose a great disturbance about the Way." Acts 19:23
(Paul speaking) "I persecuted the followers of this Way to their death, arresting both men and women and throwing them into prison" Acts 22:4
"But we want to hear what your views are, for we know that people everywhere are talking against this sect." Acts 28:22
Throughout Acts, Luke references the followers of Yeshua as members of the sect of Nazarenes that followed the Way. Why then does Matthew provide an explanation that results in the Christian world believing that Yeshua was called a Nazarene because he lived in Nazareth? The answer to this question is can be found carefully hidden in Luke's writing.
Both of the books authored by Luke, the book of Luke and the book of Acts, are letters addressed to Theophilus. Scholars have never determined who this person was. Some assume it was a new Christian but there is no records of an actual person by this name. Is there a hidden meaning to this name? Theo means God. Philus comes from the word for love. The most prominent theologian (or lover of God) of this time period was Philo...Theo - philo... could the name Theophilus actually be a code to the first century Christians reading the works of Luke? Perhaps he is saying the readers should go to Philo to understand this scripture?
The Jewish philosopher, Philo was famous for his writings and his admiration for the Therapeutae, an Egyptian Essene sect. Some speculate that he was an Essene himself. Philo's works were enthusiastically received by the followers of the Way. It would not be unusual for Luke to call on Philo's methodology. It is very possible that his reference to Theophilus was a thinly veiled psuedonym for Philo that would have been easily recognized by those in the know.
Philo writings asserted that there is a twofold meaning in the Bible, the literal and the allegorical. The two interpretations, however, are not of equal importance. The literal sense is adapted to human needs. The allegorical sense is the deeper meaning. It is the meaning that only those who are initiated can understand. Yeshua often used this method in his parables. He allowed the crowd to understand the literal meaning but later, in private, explained the deeper meaning to his disciples. This is what he meant when he would often say, "He who has eyes to see, let him see"
Philo developed a special method to determine if there was an allegorical meaning to a scripture. As a result of his rules of interpretation, the literal sense of some passages of Bible must be excluded altogether. In these passages, the literal interpretation would say something unworthy of God or of scripture, so one must look for an allegorical meaning. If a literal interpretation is senseless or contradictory or inadmissible, then one should look for an allegorical interpretation. Also, an allegorical expression can be used to draw a reader's attention to the fact that the literal sense is to be disregarded.
Philo developed special rules that directed the reader to recognize the passages in which there may also be an allegorical interpretation, and a deeper meaning. The following is a list of his rules of allegory.
- The doubling of a phrase;
- An apparently superfluous expression in the text;
- The repetition of statements previously made;
- A change of phraseology—all these phenomena point to something special that the reader must consider.
- An entirely different meaning found by a different combination of the words, disregarding the ordinarily accepted division of the sentence in question into phrases and clauses.
- The synonyms must be carefully studied as to why one phrase is used in one passage and a different one in another, etc.
- A play upon words utilized for finding a deeper meaning
- A definite allegorical sense may be gathered from certain particles, adverbs, prepositions, etc.;
- and in certain cases it can be gathered even from the parts of a word.
- Every word must be explained in all its meanings, in order that different interpretations may be found.
- The skillful interpreter may make slight changes in a word, following the rabbinical rule, "Read not this way, but that way." Philo, therefore, changed accents, breathings, etc., in Greek words.
- Any peculiarity in a phrase justifies the assumption that some special meaning is intended: e.g., where "one" is used instead of "first" etc. Details regarding the form of words are very important:
- The number of the word, if it shows any peculiarity in the singular or the plural: the tense of the verb, etc.;
- The gender of the noun;
- The presence or omission of the article;
- The artificial interpretation of a single expression;
- The position of the verses of a passage;
- Peculiar verse-combinations;
- Noteworthy omissions;
- Striking statements;
- Numerical symbolism: Philo found much material for this symbolism in the Hebrew Bible, and he developed it more thoroughly according to the methods of the Pythagoreans and Stoics.
So back to the question at hand: Using Philo's rules of allegory, what was Luke trying to reveal in his writings? Let us start with some key passages in the first chapter of the book of Luke. I will use excerpts below but you can read the entire chapter by clicking here.
Luke 1:5-20 contains important links to the Old Testament that reveal who the story is about. In this passage, an "Angel of the Lord" appears to Zechariah, the father of John the Baptist. The story Luke wrote of John's conception is taken almost verbatim from the Old Testament story of the conception of Samson which is described in the Book of Judges. Here are some selected passages that depict the similarity:
...there was a priest named Zechariah, who belonged to the priestly division of Abijah; his wife Elizabeth was also a descendant of Aaron. 6Both of them were upright in the sight of God, observing all the Lord's commandments and regulations blamelessly. 7But they had no children, because Elizabeth was barren; and they were both well along in years. Luke 1:5-7
1Then an angel of the Lord appeared to him, standing at the right side of the altar of incense.... the angel said to him: "Do not be afraid, Zechariah; your prayer has been heard. Your wife Elizabeth will bear you a son, and you are to give him the name John. 14He will be a joy and delight to you, and many will rejoice because of his birth, 15for he will be great in the sight of the Lord. He is never to take wine or other fermented drink, and he will be filled with the Holy Spirit even from birth Luke 11:1-13
...Manoah, from the clan of the Danites, had a wife who was sterile and remained childless. 3 The angel of the LORD appeared to her and said, "You are sterile and childless, but you are going to conceive and have a son. 4 Now see to it that you drink no wine or other fermented drink and that you do not eat anything unclean, 5 because you will conceive and give birth to a son. No razor may be used on his head, because the boy is to be a Nazirite, set apart to God from birth, and he will begin the deliverance of Israel from the hands of the Philistines. Judges 13:2-5
The key to understanding the allegorical meaning of this passage is Philo's rule number 19, noteworthy omissions. This story about John the Baptist was nothing more than a retelling of the story of Samson. There is one piece of information provided about Samson, however, that Luke omitted when he copied Judges to introduce John the Baptist. Samson was a Nazarite. Nazarites were a precursor sect to the Nazarenes. What Luke was trying to say, is just like Samson, John the Baptist was of the sect of the Nazarenes.
There is another passages in the first chapter of Luke that mirrors an old testament passage. In Luke 1: 46-55, there is a well-known section of scripture in which Miriam, mother of Yeshua praises the Lord. This section which is known as 'The Magnificat" is strikingly similar to the "Song of Hannah" found in l Samuel 2:1-10. Hannah (Anna) was married to Elkanah. Like John the Baptist mother and Samson's mother, Hannah had been unable to conceive. In l Samuel 1-11, she made this vow, "O LORD Almighty, if you will only look upon your servant's misery and remember me, and not forget your servant but give her a son, then I will set him before you as a Nazarite for all the days of his life, and no razor will ever be used on his head."
After making this vow, Hannah became pregnant and bore a son, Samuel. She did not forget her vow. Later in chapter one of l Samuel, she is quoted as saying, "After the child is weaned, I will take him and present him before the LORD..., I will offer him as a Nazarite for all time." So Hannah and baby Samuel were also Nazarites. According to Philo's rule of noteworthy omissions, Luke's associated Miriam, mother of Yeshua with Hannah and Samuel.Samuel was consecrated as a Nazarite at birth and became the new high priest of Israel. Yeshua was a Nazarene who guided us to a new way of worship.
Luke's method of defining "The Way" and identifying the Nazarenes as the fourth sect was incredibly clever. He took great care to submerge his information in wording that would not be immediately understood by the uninitiated. Apparently he was not able to write openly about Yeshua and John's association with the Nazarenes. In his writings, he explains the reason why he must be so cautious. He states that there are those who would persecute and malign the Nazarenes. These unnamed enemies also apparently did not want Yeshua or John the Baptist associated with the Nazarene sect.
Who was this enemy of "The Way"? Luke's closing words in chapter one reveal the answer. In Luke 1:68-79, there is the following prophesy spoken by the father of John the Baptist:
67His father Zechariah was filled with the Holy Spirit and prophesied:
68"Praise be to the Lord, the God of Israel,
because he has come and has redeemed his people.
69He has raised up a horn of salvation for us
in the house of his servant David
70(as he said through his holy prophets of long ago),
71salvation from our enemies
and from the hand of all who hate us—
72to show mercy to our fathers
and to remember his holy covenant,
73the oath he swore to our father Abraham:
74to rescue us from the hand of our enemies,
and to enable us to serve him without fear
75in holiness and righteousness before him all our days.
76And you, my child, will be called a prophet of the Most High;
for you will go on before the Lord to prepare the way for him,
77to give his people the knowledge of salvation
through the forgiveness of their sins,
78because of the tender mercy of our God,
by which the rising sun will come to us from heaven
79to shine on those living in darkness
and in the shadow of death,
to guide our feet into the Way of peace."
According to Philo's rule # 20 (striking statements), Luke used the term Holy Spirit, to signal that this passage has a deeper meaning. Luke guides us to David as the key to this passage. Some of the words of this passage can also be found in the words of David. In the preface to Psalm 18, it says, "David the servant of the LORD. He sang to the LORD the words of this song when YHVH delivered him from the hand of all his enemies and from the hand of Saul." Luke put the words spoken by David in Zechariah's prophesy but omitted the name of the enemy. Remember Philo's rule of noteworthy omissions (rule # 19). Luke was saying that the enemy was Saul.
There were three noteworthy omissions found in the first chapter of Luke. First, Luke omitted Nazarite to associate John the Baptist (Nazarene) with Samson (Nazarite). Then Luke omitted Nazarite again to associate Yeshua (Nazarene) with Samuel (Nazarite). The third omission was the name Saul as David and John / Yeshua's enemy.
Philo and the Essenes both had a great interest in numerical symbolism. (See rule #21) Philo utilized Pythagorean sacred numbers. It is interesting to note that there are five numbers in Luke chapter one. Those numbers are: Five (Luke 1:24), six (Luke 1:26), six (Luke 1:36), three (Luke 1:56), and eight (Luke 1:59).
5 x 6 x 6 x 3 x 8 = 4320 (one of the most "Sacred" of the Pythagorean "Sacred Numbers"
4320 divided by 2 = 2160 which is the diameter of the moon (the great light of the night)
432,000 multiplied 2 = 864,000 which is the diameter of the sun (the great light of the day)
432 x 432 = 186,614 which is the speed of light within .0012 miles per second
Luke ends the prophecy of Zechariah with "the rising sun will come to us from heaven to shine on those living in darkness and in the shadow of death, to guide our feet into the Way of peace." The Nazarenes were called "children of light" and there "Way" was the way of peace. The numerical symbolism emphasized the light by leading to daylight, night light and the speed of light.
The solution to the allegorical puzzle presented by Luke is as follows:
"We are Nazarenes.The Way of the Nazarenes began with the Nazarites Moses elected to serve God (Numbers 6:1-5). The Knowledge of the Nazarites became the Science of the Pythagorean "Sacred Numbers." We are not residents of Nazareth. We are members of a sect that is opposed by powerful people who will destroy anything we write that openly tells of the knowledge we hold and the persecution we face. We have been accused of causing great disturbances when in fact we have tried to set the people free by teaching them the Truth. The hand of our enemy – the enemy of Knowledge and Truth - belongs to Saul."
Luke's gospel was written to correct the misinformation contained in Paul's letters and Matthew's gospel that claimed to be about, and on behalf of, JESUS THE NAZARENE. This is just the first allegorical message that contains the theme that Saul aka Paul was an infiltrator and enemy of the Nazarenes, and Matthew's gospel was written (or altered) to lead people away from Jesus' teachings, also known as THE WAY OF THE NAZARENES.
More Insight
If you would like to study this subject further, here are some helpful links.
As I promised, I have included articles from my friends at www.thenazareneway.com.
The original series of articles on allegory: Allegory 101
More evidence why Yeshua was a member of the Nazarenes and NOT a resident of Nazareth: Nazarenes vs Nazareth
Another view point on the enemies of "The Way".




